- Interpol,
“NYC”, Turn On The Bright Lights
Few bands were as hated for their quality as Interpol was in
2002. Low-level music snobs were united in celebration; finally, there was a
good, popular band that wore their influences so obviously and openly that
their quality could be dismissed out of hand by even the least well-listened
hipster. It was like a connect-the-dots puzzle for dummies, with a straight
line between Joy Division and this band of charlatan mimics. People waved off
the band, laughing while wearing a Closer t-shirt from Hot Topic: “You
only think they’re good because you think they’re original.”
You may have guessed that I was one of those sneering snobs,
for a while at least. I enjoyed the bigger singles from the album (“PDA” and
“Obstacle 1”) when they were originally released, but the more I read about the
band, the more irritated I became. I was outraged that they had allegedly
ripped off Joy Division (despite never having heard one of their albums all the
way through at that point) and The Chameleons (who I started listening to due
to their claimed similarities to Interpol), and I quickly dropped the album out
of my rotation.
It was at that point that I attempted to enter the
off-putting world of post-punk, one of those cheerful genres that actively
works at being alien and intimidating. The effort was short-lived; I enjoyed
The Chameleons and have a firm, unyielding love for the Bowie albums that
contributed a basic foundation for the genre (the Berlin trilogy and Station
To Station, namely), but found the rest of the genre rather masturbatory.
I realize that’s a bit of an odd term to apply to a genre
that was apparently focused on reducing music to elements even rawer than
punks, but even a cursory glance at the genre reveals that the idea faded
rather quickly. Post-punk and punk have in common two things: intent to rip up
popular music and start over again (devolution, in other words) and a complete
and utter failure to do so. Post-punk had been scooped on the idea of radical
minimalism and primitivism in music decades ago; Stravinsky’s “Rite of Spring”
did everything post-punk sought for in 1913, and incited a riot in doing so. By
the time Public Image LTD rolled around, John Cage had already mastered the idea with “4’
33””, a ‘song’ devoted to exploring the natural aesthetics of a quiet room.
There’s also the simple fact that the post-punk music that
is today well-known and respected is still pop music. Like the best punk music,
post-punk lacks the reckless courage of John Cage and other avant-garde artists
in the way it clings to basic pop structures. A more accurate mission statement
for punk would have been that they were seeking the devolution of Western pop,
a mission in which they arguably succeeded.
Post-punk was a reaction to punk music quickly building upon
its foundation to create ska, New Wave, and a second wave of rock and roll, and
resorted to trying to rip out its own heart by turning to synthesizers,
mechanized monotones, and other tools of artificialization. A glance at the
modern day, artificially-flavored pop music can tell you how that experiment
panned out; synthesizers, vocalizers, and other robot paraphernalia stopped
being cutting edge and became pop standbys within a scant 5 years.
The easiest way to trace that transformation is with Joy
Division themselves. Like The Cure and Siouxsie & The Banshees (who were
the first band to actually be called ‘post-punk’, interestingly enough), Joy
Division found their niche in the genre with music that was, at best,
unbearably bleak. Though tragic, the suicide of the band’s principal songwriter
and singer, Ian Curtis, surprised precisely no one. What was surprising was
what followed, as the remainder of the band became one of the foremost pop
groups of the 80s, New Order, with the best-selling 12” single of all time to
their name.
That the bleak 3AM feeling Joy Division and other post-punk
artists pioneers could become chart-topping material is obvious now, with artists
in the same vein (The XX and Jamie Woon, for example) repeating the feat in
both critical and commercial success. I’d go so far as to argue that much of
the past decade owes a significant debt to the broadcast-from-the-moon feel of
those classic post-punk and Krautrock tracks, from the electronica and trip-hop
boom of the late 90s through to the similarly artificial diet pop movement of
the present day.
The most obvious connection, though, is to the bands that
reductive critics were quick to label as post-punk revival. Like garage-rock
revival, which I discussed before, the post-punk revival of the early 00s was
more of a development on an old, relatively unpopular genre. You may as well
label The Rolling Stones as Delta-blues revival if you follow that trend; it’s
little more than a ridiculous way for rock critics to feel even smugger.
Nothing is more satisfying to the ego than dismissively labeling something. I
would know.
Interpol certainly has similarities with their English
musical relatives, but most of those lie solely in the overall mood. Both
Interpol and Joy Division use atmospheric elements in their songs, achieved
through repetition in the main melodic instruments and a vocal monotone that
occasionally gets drenched in echo. They also share an extraordinarily strong
rhythm section which are often given a natural focus in many of their songs, a
carryover from punk music (on a side note, this is one of the few elements U2
maintains from their own roots as a post-punk band). Lyrical themes of isolation
are also common to both.
The main differences lie in the musical textures both bands
use. In music analysis, ‘texture’ refers to the sound of specific instruments;
trumpets have a smooth texture, while distorted guitars have a rough texture.
Terms affiliated with it have entered the popular culture to some extent, ala
smooth jazz, and it’s an important tool for discussing music.
Based on Joy Division’s music, texture was also the thing
Ian Curtis was most concerned with as a songwriter. Virtually every element of
any given Joy Division song (aside from “Love Will Tear Us Apart”, the only
song they did that’s readily identifiable as pop) is designed to enhance and
complement the flat monotone of Ian Curtis’ standard singing voice. This
results in the typical characteristics of the band: atonality and punchy, distorted bass lines.
The emphasis on rhythm is likely part of this, as an emphasis on melody would
be a bit tricky with all the distortion and atonal guitar licks.
This anti-melody stance is in stark contrast to Interpol who
share the well-earned rhythm section spotlight, but also feature far more
melodic basslines, such as on “The New”. This resembles a Joy Division song
only in broad strokes; only the album’s most aesthetically challenging track,
“Roland”, comes close to fitting that mold.
Though the mood’s the same, the emotions and textures are
different. Both artists operate in the wee small hours of the morning, but
Interpol generally does so in the comfort of the city life. If Joy Division
sometimes feels like being imprisoned in the modern world, Interpol often feels
like a comforting stroll through one’s favorite city. “NYC” puts it best: “I
know you've supported me for a long time/Somehow I'm not impressed/but New York
cares”.
That theme of escape crops up frequently on the album, from
“Say Hello To The Angels” (“We should take a trip now to see new places//I'm
sick of this town”) to the entirety of “Stella Was A Diver And She Was Always
Down”, but I don’t think there is a single, coherent theme to the album. Solace
is a possible candidate, as is escape or even city life, but when roughly half
the songs are comprised of more-or-less impressionistic lyrics focused
(probably) on simple relationships, I don’t really want to take a leap of logic.
That being said, I do want to highlight the melodic and
altogether lovely song “The New” for providing the album’s clearest break from
its post-punk roots. Even after listening to Doug Paisley’s debut in-depth,
this song’s opening lyrics (“I wish I could live free/I hope it's not beyond
me/Settling down, it takes time/One day we'll live together/And life will be
better”) stand out as some of the most conservative in recent memory. I’m not
saying that in a derogatory way; even if I wasn’t something of an old
fuddy-duddy myself, I still adore hearing uncommon sentiments in music, and the
idea of finding freedom through a committed relationship is separate from
nearly every form of popular music I know of. It’s certainly a far cry from the
hedonism and basic emotions typical of rock and pop.
I’d argue that Turn On The Bright Lights should be
understood as a consistent piece not due to any coherent theme but simply by
virtue of style and mood. Like Joy Division, Interpol chose to make an album
that invites easy comparisons to the 3AM haze of city life. Unlike their
predecessors, however, Interpol focus more on the city lights than the black,
starless sky.
No comments:
Post a Comment