Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Week 12: Petrolz - EVE2009 (2009)


Broadly put, there are two basic ways to listen to music: critically and naively. A critical perspective, the one I’ve adopted on this blog for example, attempts to connect the music in question to other topics or examples. This can range from analyses of cultural and historical background to simple comparisons of the discussed music to other artists or genres. In other words, a critical perspective is anything that attempts to make explanations of a musical piece.

The other way to discuss music is naively. That word isn’t meant as a pejorative; a naïve perspective is simply one in which only the music in question is being discussed. Nothing else is brought into the conversation, and for that reason such discussion is often limited to stating facts (“That keyboard is a Melotron set to imitate a flute.” [A fabulous no-prize to anyone who guesses that one]) or opinions (“I like this song.”). Understandably, such a perspective often gets short shrift.

One of the things music snobs like me lose is the ability to listen to music in a naïve way, at least not without expending some minor effort. My past few years of greedily devouring as much music as I could afford (often considerably more than that, to be honest) means that anytime I listen to a new song, I instinctively compare it to something else. I suspect this is what prevents, along with many others, from enjoying bland radio pap; when I hear something like Shinedown’s “Second Chance”, my mind parses it with a library of other similar songs and finds that one woefully lacking. I’m fundamentally incapable of making it past “Well I just say Hailey’s Comet, she waved/Said why you always running in place?” without vomiting up a stream of dismissal, critique, and violent sarcasm. The song deserves it, no doubt about it, but I’d hardly call that a typical response.

As far as I can tell from casual observation, the typical response to such music is to pay as little attention to it as possible. Most people, in my experience, do not pay close attention to what’s playing on the radio when they’re in the office, the club, or even their own car. It’s just noise to work along to, dance along to, or drive along to; a superior alternative to silence and little more.


Friday, March 23, 2012

Songs Of The Days: Week 11

Mar 12: The Faces - Ooh La La (Ooh La La, 1973)


Mar 13: Elvis Costello - Less Than Zero (My Aim Is True, 1977)


Mar 14: Tom Waits - Chocolate Jesus (Mule Variations, 1999)


Live version:


Mar 15: Gil Scott-Heron - The Revolution Will Not Be Televised (Small Talk At 125th And Lennox, 1970)


Mar 16: Billy Paul - Me And Mrs. Jones (360 Degrees Of Billy Paul, 1972)



Mar 17: En Vogue - Free Your Mind (Funky Divas, 1992)


Mar 18: The Streets - Sharp Darts (Original Pirate Material, 2002)


Thursday, March 22, 2012

Week 11: Sharon Jones & The Dap-Kings - Naturally (2005)


That so many bands and musicians feel the need to regress their music to bygone eras in order to express themselves is something that plagues my mind. The modern-day movement of making one’s music sound like it’s already began accumulating rust and mold seems to indicate, to me at least, a low-level apathy, or perhaps even antipathy, towards recorded sound.

It’s all very teenage, isn’t it? I remember quite clearly the days when I dismissed all music made after I was born in favor of old classics, and I think the revival trend comes out of a similar lack of interest in what’s being done today. It’s a far stronger statement to deliberately make one’s music sound poorly recorded than it is to simply record a blues or soul album. Tarnished music sends out a message of disrespect to modern-day technology and style, especially when coupled with music that deliberately harkens back to pop music roots music from the 60s and 70s.

As I’ve said repeatedly on this blog, I have no issue with retro music. I don’t even a problem with music that isn’t cutting edge or trying to anything new save contribute to the ever-growing canon of great music. What I do have a problem with is using modern recording studios to mimic the sound of poor musicians playing to an oversized tape recorder, all in some grand statement against the soullessness of modern music.


Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Week 10: Holy Ghost! - Holy Ghost! (2011)


Contrary to what you may believe, I don’t hate pop music. The varieties of music (and other things besides) I do hate and revile is quite lengthy, especially when you break it down by artist, but something as broad and generally inoffensive as ‘pop’ doesn’t begin to qualify. After all, I’m not a hipster, nor am I a surly 16-year old who listens to “everything but country and rap”, a line I once, regretfully, used.

I am a snob, and a proud one at that, but that’s led me, in recent years, to sample far more music than I necessarily talk about. Being a snob isn’t about dismissing things out of hand, but judgment and critique. I actually listen to terrible music before bitching at length about it, which I consider remarkable progress.

Generally speaking, anyone who says that they hate a given genre of music isn’t worth your time. There’s something of worth to be found in every genre under the sun, with the possible exception of genres snobs like me occasionally conjure up to describe the things we hate (corporate/plastic (or plasticine as I may start saying) pop, in my case). Even in those cases, someone with enough bullheadedness could probably get me to weakly acknowledge some Top 40 bubblegum swill as decent, even without relying on the nostalgia factor, which can override anyone’s common sense.

Of course, when I say that I don’t hate pop music it doesn’t carry much weight. After all, when a single genre can be stretched and distorted enough to contain Michael Jackson, Weezer, Frank Sinatra, The Beatles (you don’t a fucking link, I think), The Who, Blondie, and Aretha Franklin among many, many others, it holds little actual meaning. Saying, “I like pop music,” is rather similar to saying, “I like weather.” It begs a follow-up question: “What kind of pop music?”

Which is of course a ridiculous question if you read it literally: saying, “I like pop,” is supposed to be the equivalent of, “I like whatever’s on the radio,” or “I like what everyone else likes,” and should earn the immediate follow-up of a disdainful glance and a sip of your liquor of choice. However, as Steve Hyden pointed out, “’Pop’ is no longer short for ‘popular’; it’s simply one choice in a sea of genres.” Much like the terms ‘indie’ or ‘alternative’ (which will be addressed at some point in the future, promise), the label of ‘pop’ has become as hazy and indistinct as a telephone pole on an ill-advised drive home.


Sunday, March 11, 2012

Songs Of The Days; Week 10

Mar 5: Queens Of The Stone Age - 3s & 7s (Era Vulgaris, 2007)


Mar 6: Nirvana - Rape Me (In Utero, 1993)


Mar 7: T.Rex - 20th Century Boy (single, 1973) (not available on Spotify)


Mar 8: Buckethead - The Homing Beacon (A Song For Michael Jackson, 2009) (not available on Spotify) (freely available)


Mar 9: Dexy's Midnight Runners - Come On Eileen (Too-Rye-Ay, 1982)


Mar 10: Captain Beefheart & His Magic Band - Sure 'Nuff 'N Yes I Do (Safe As Milk, 1967)


Mar 11: Michael Jackson - Billie Jean (Thriller, 1982)

Loudness War Follow-Up: Billie Jean

I'm going to keep this brief, as I believe I explicitly promised not to dip into this particular well again. But hell, I just can't seem to help myself when it comes to this topic.

As you may have seen, today's Song Of The Day is "Billie Jean", prompted mainly by me managing to find a FLAC (lossless audio file format) rip of the original Thriller vinyl. I'll spare you a talk about how great this album is, as you've likely embraced it already all on your lonesome. And if you haven't... well. I wouldn't know what to say.

Anyway, I pursued a digitalized-vinyl copy of this album for one reason: the remastered CDs are unbearably terrible. I picked up the 25th Anniversary version ages ago, and it very nearly managed to make me hate the album. Why? Take a look at the waveform (remember those?) for "Billie Jean", the album's stand-out track:


Jesus Christ! This is roughly similar to the waveform for Pearl Jam's Ten which, by all rights, should be considerably louder than slickly produced R&B like Thriller.

For comparison, here's the waveform for the original vinyl, after I recoded it from FLAC to an MP3 at v0 VBR (basically an extremely high quality MP3 file; don't worry about it if you don't understand it):


Mhmm. That's some loveliness right there. Note that there's absolutely no clipping (indicated by lines hitting the top or bottom of the chart) on this version of the track. Also note the variations on the track's peaks; while the remaster is brickwalled to hell and back, there's virtually no compression at all on the original master.

This is a major reason why audiophiles have a loathing for record company remasters; the new standards for volume and production (very fucking high and none at all, respectively) render most of them actively bothersome to listen to. Hearing "Billie Jean" shouldn't be an ordeal, but a lovely bit of pleasure, wouldn't you agree?



I can't really give you a YouTube comparison, but if you have Spotify try the following comparison: cue up the 'Thriller 25 Deluxe Edition' or 'Thriller 25 Super Deluxe Edition' (they're roughly the same) version of "Billie Jean" and compare either to the one listed as from plain old 'Thriller', and pay specific attention to the way the drums sound in the intro. I think you'll be able to notice an audible difference.

That's all for today. See you all on Wednesday!

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Week 9: Spoon - Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga (2007)

Music critics are terrified to the point of paralysis of writing about music. It’s understandable; as the quote above references, what, really, is there to say? Should I, the critic, describe in clumsy onomatopoeias the sound of a song’s snare drum or first chord? Should I wax on rhapsodically in clumsy, twee analogies about the pure loveliness of the song? Or should I go the cultural analysis route, as I’ve been doing for much of this blog?

Generally speaking, the more complex the music is, the easier it is to sidestep actual analysis by simply performing lengthy descriptions. This is more journalism than critique, and its pointlessness is well expressed by the quote at the top of this post. This is why I tend towards discussing the music in relation to other pieces; I’m attempting to avoid the flowery pitfall that Pitchfork so often enjoys wallowing in.

Simple music, in contrast, is often virtually impossible to approach in any significant, intriguing way. Most reviews of such albums tend towards reference overdosing; they drop names like a Hollywood starlet looking for a job, building a net of bands, albums, and songs that, in theory, refer to, quote, and take inspiration from each other. Such networks form neat little timelines and genres, but, again, can be stymied by music that deliberately acts as a regression to a prior generation of music.


Monday, March 5, 2012

Songs Of The Days; Week 9

Feb 27: Moondog - Stamping Ground (Moondog, 1969) (not available on Spotify)


Feb 28: Mudhoney - Touch Me I'm Sick (single, 1988)



Feb 29: Tubeway Army - Down In The Park (Replicas, 1979)


Mar 1: Bruce Springsteen - Badlands (Darkness On The Edge Of Town, 1978)

 

Mar 2: Bruce Springsteen - Atlantic City (Nebraska, 1982)

 

Mar 3: Leo Kottke - Ojo (6 And 12 String Guitar, 1969) (Live version only)

 

Mar 4: Tom Waits - Long Way Home (Orphans: Brawlers, Bawlers, and Bastards, 2006)



Alternate mix: