"It's about people on
the fringes, on the edges of humanity and society. […] Why are they unable to
empathize? It’s sort of a metaphor - there's something missing, a black hole, a
cancer in their soul. It's an absence in the soul."
Progressive rock is much
like pop in that it relies almost entirely on presentation. Regardless of the
relative minimums of technical proficiency and sex appeal (respectively), both
genres strive to present a flashy, impressive exterior with little attention
spent on providing meaningful emotional content. Lots of sound and very little
fury, in other words.
In fact, I would go so far
as to say that the tightly arranged, technically pruned sounds of present-day
plastic pop was originally inspired by the similarly controlled sounds of 70s
progressive rock. Granted, prog achieved that perfected sound through careful
production, obsessive songwriters, and extremely talented musicians while pop
simply runs raw sound through computer programs, but the end result of glossy
product is essentially the same. It’s the aural equivalent of comparing a
photograph of a naturally beautiful woman with light makeup to a homely woman
airbrushed and Photoshopped to hell and back; the methods may be different,
with prog being a playground for musicians and pop for producers, but the final
images are fairly similar.
The main difference between
those images, in a more complex metaphor, would be the content. Progressive
rock, thanks mainly to the boundless influence of Led Zeppelin, tends to be
descriptive. It’s no mistake that prog and fantasy imagery often gets linked by
artists and record sleeve designers alike; the two fields are similar in that
they’re trying to build extremely detailed worlds that can be marveled at by
the consumer.